Release from Scholarship OT3 Devon Manual
Awarding ScholarShip to OG Bernie Kane
OT3 Devon Manual {processed}
-
PCFLCommish
- Site Admin
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2024 8:03 pm
Re: OT3 Devon Manual
This move is declined because league rules require 3 Gs and 3 Ts. You wouldn't want to have no backup T and have Gs playing T when the starting Ts are fatigued. This would weaken your offensive line. PLease see the Min-Max in the Teams and Requiring file that gives the numbers our ratings model at each position are based on.
-
Great White (Shark)
Re: OT3 Devon Manual
Where can I find the Min-Max in the Teams and Requiring file that gives the numbers our ratings model?PCFLCommish wrote: ↑Mon Jan 06, 2025 3:48 pm This move is declined because league rules require 3 Gs and 3 Ts. You wouldn't want to have no backup T and have Gs playing T when the starting Ts are fatigued. This would weaken your offensive line. PLease see the Min-Max in the Teams and Requiring file that gives the numbers our ratings model at each position are based on.
It is not on the forum, especially not in the rules threads.
If I understand what you are saying- Both players are in Open Slots, that supposed to be flexible, not Assigned to just one position. With all due respect this is a stupid rule, of people that do not know football. It says we are going to create standard in OL positions' certain rating (ratings wise that Guard is better than the 3rd T & all sign-able Ts) that prevents better Linemen playing Gs to play Ts positions, even as backups. I am not trying to switch the G to T, I am simply trying to use him as a backup T. Is The PCFL trying to say Gs (& Cs for that matter) cannot be equal to. let alone better than, Ts? Why the heck are standards for ratings models created this way? This all of this happens all the time in video computer Football & IRW FB.